When Gaurav Bansal’s lawyers told
him about Singapore’s tightened hedge-fund rules introduced in
August 2012, he faced the prospect of spiraling costs to meet
the demands for starting his own fund.
The solution was to sign up with Swiss-Asia Financial
Services Pte, which provides infrastructure, office space and
services to meet compliance requirements and is licensed by the
Monetary Authority of Singapore.
“The regulatory change threw a spanner in the works,”
said Bansal, 40, who started his Salmon Global Fund with $4
million of assets in March under the Swiss-Asia Financial
umbrella. “They really came to my rescue.”
Bansal is among managers of smaller startup funds in
Singapore, Asia’s biggest hedge-fund hub after Hong Kong, who
are turning to such platforms to reduce costs. Swiss-Asia
Financial signed up 20 managers seeking to start their own funds
in the past nine months, while the number of new funds set up
more than doubled to seven last year at Gordian Capital
Singapore Pte, according to the companies.
“If you have less than $40 million in assets under
management and you are launching a fund aimed at global
investors, it has become much more difficult,” said Mark Voumard, chief executive officer of Gordian Capital. A platform
“that allows managers to focus on their skill set is both a
cost-effective and efficient option.”
Stricter Regulation
Asia-based hedge funds oversaw a combined $79.7 billion as
of March, having recovered by 41 percent from the April 2009
trough, according to Eurekahedge Pte. In Singapore, 288 fund-management companies had $15.3 billion of assets under
management as of March, compared with $25.2 billion managed by
447 firms in Hong Kong, the Singapore-based data provider said.
“The investor network that platforms can offer should also
be viewed as a key driver to joining a platform,” said Omar
Taheri, business development manager at Swiss-Asia Financial.
“After all, raising capital is still one of the most difficult
tasks when you start a hedge fund.”
The tighter regulations introduced by the MAS in 2012
mainly affected smaller entities that were previously known as
exempt fund managers.
Under the previous rules, companies seeking to start under
the exempt status were “encouraged” to have at least two
professionals with a minimum of five years of experience,
according to Singapore-based law firm Colin Ng Partners LLP.
They weren’t subject to audit requirements, business conduct
rules or restrictions on assets under management. The only
relevant rules were that they weren’t allowed to have more than
30 qualified investors as clients.
Tightened Regulations
Under the tightened regulations, registered fund management
companies must have at least two relevant professionals with a
certain level of experience. In addition, they aren’t allowed to
manage more than S$250 million ($200 million) or have more than
30 qualified investors as clients, as opposed to licensed funds
managers, who have no such restrictions.
Registered managers also have to meet certain capital
requirements, need to implement a compliance and risk management
framework and are subject to tighter reporting, accounting and
auditing requirements, according to the regulator.
The city-state had about 540 exempt fund managers under the
old rules, an estimate by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP showed.
About 200 of the exempt-status managers chose to become
registered, while about 190 of them obtained a fund-manager
license with higher requirements and unlimited assets under
management, it said.
‘Terminal’ Change
About 90 fund managers who were exempt shut down, joined
other companies such as family offices or signed up with a
platform, while the remaining 60 have either applied for a
license or to become a registered fund manager, according to the
consulting firm.
“For 80 percent of the exempt fund managers the change in
regulation made no difference,” said Peter Douglas, principal
of Singapore-based research firm GFIA Pte. “For 20 percent it
was terminal.”
Not all newer fund managers are linking up with partners
providing non-investment services. Integral Capital Pte started
a long-only fund in 2011 under the old regime and chose to
become a registered fund manager when the new rules were
introduced, even with the higher costs, said Talib Dohadwala, a
founding partner at the Singapore-based company. The stricter
regulations mandate an audited financial statement as well as a
risk management audit, both done by an external firm that could
cost more than S$15,000, according to Dohadwala.
“We wanted to be independent and run our business
autonomously,” said Dohadwala. “We felt from the beginning
that we could meet the requirements under the new regime.”
Proper Regulations
The new regulations are making Singapore a more sustainable
and robust environment for fund managers, according to Bill
Jamieson, a partner at Colin Ng Partners.
“I don’t think those regulations are overkill,” Jamieson
said. “Singapore, being a proper financial market, needs proper
regulation.”
Bansal found a cost-effective solution by joining Swiss-Asia Financial.
“If you do it exactly by the book and set up a registered
office with the amount of space that is required as for the
regulations and employees it would easily cost between S$250,000
and S$300,000 per year,” Bansal said. “By setting up business
with the platform I save more than half of that amount.”
‘Saving Money’
Five out of 20 that have signed up with Swiss-Asia
Financial are either already in business or about to start,
Chief Operating Officer Steve Knabl said in Singapore. That
compares with one fund a year starting in previous years, he
said, adding that the company has seen a “dramatic increase of
interest.”
“The challenge we are having is some fund managers are not
willing to pay our platform fees,” said Taheri, adding that
managers should realize they can save money going with a
platform rather than setting up on their own.
Roshan Padamadan also started the Luminance Global Fund,
which invests in liquid securities including stocks, bonds and
derivatives, in January with Swiss-Asia Financial. He chose to
start through the company because it allows him to focus on his
investments.
“If you run your own hedge fund, you have to devote about
half of your time and energy to administration and
organization,” said Padamadan, who started with initial capital
of about $1 million and now manages $1.55 million. “Working on
a platform, you can spend much more time on the actual
investment process. I prefer to keep my head clear for that.”
Archimedean Point
Anil Ponnampalam, manager of the Archimedean Point Fund,
said that investing under a licensed company helps dispel
investors’ concerns that a new fund’s operations may not be
robust. Ponnampalam started his Asia-focused long-short equity
fund with Gordian Capital this month, he said.
“It’s about mitigating the business and operational risks
to allow me to focus on the performance as an investment
manager,” Ponnampalam said. “I owe that to every investor in
my fund.”
Gordian Capital, which typically attracted three new funds
on average annually, saw the number grow to seven new funds in
2013, Voumard said. Two have already started this year and two
more will begin soon, he said. Inquiries have also doubled to
about 100 managers seeking to start in the past 12 months, he
said.
“If you either have a small asset size or no interest in
building an organization, then some kind of a platform deal is
very sensible,” Douglas said.
To contact the reporter on this story:
Klaus Wille in Singapore at
kwille@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Andreea Papuc at
apapuc1@bloomberg.net
Tomoko Yamazaki, Lars Klemming
Hedge-Fund Startups Adapt to New Singapore Rules
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét