Thứ Tư, 2 tháng 10, 2013

China"s Poisoned Air Prompts Woman to Devise Green Tax

Reading in her hotel room in 1996,

geology student Cao Jing noticed something alarming: the pages

of her book were being coated with brown coal dust.


Her realization — in Qinhuangdao, a tourist city where
China’s Great Wall meets the sea — marks the moment when the

young undergraduate at Beijing’s Tsinghua University became

interested in studying the effects of China’s runaway industrial

pollution. It was the first step in a 17-year journey that has

taken Cao, 36, into the field of economics to tackle emissions

in the world’s biggest producer of greenhouse gases.


Her work gained a new urgency after a leadership change

this year installed President Xi Jinping, who has promised to

combat pollution even at the cost of slowing the economy. Cao’s

goal is to develop a tax structure that would curb harmful

emissions with the least effect on growth and company profits.


“China is in urgent need of climate policies like a carbon

tax to save energy and reduce emissions,” said Cao, an

associate professor of economics at Tsinghua and a consultant

for the World Bank. “If they are well designed, there will be

no big impact on the economy. If they are poorly designed, they

may bring disastrous consequences.”


Cao, also a researcher at Tsinghua National Institute of

Fiscal Studies funded by the Ministry of Finance, predicts the

government initially will adopt a carbon tax. She says this

would have a smaller economic impact — and so is more

politically acceptable in China — than the cap-and-trade model

adopted in the European Union, where companies buy and sell

permits to pollute.


Health Benefits


If China started with a tax of 10 yuan ($1.63) a ton of

carbon dioxide this year and raised it steadily to about 50 yuan

by 2020, carbon emissions could fall by as much as 19 percent,

while health and energy benefits would mean the effect on

economic growth would be almost zero, she said.


China’s State Council has set a 2020 goal of reducing

carbon-dioxide emissions per unit of gross domestic product by

40 to 45 percent from 2005 levels. Cao’s study, “Towards a Low-Carbon Economy: The Design of a Carbon-Tax Policy for China and

an Analysis of the CGE Model,” won the McKinsey China Economics

Award
in 2011 for its contribution to the policy debate on

“tackling greenhouse-gas emissions in an economically and

environmentally sustainable way.”


‘Main Stars’


“She is one of the main stars in the energy and

environmental economics field in China,” said Thomas Sterner,

visiting chief economist at the Environmental Defense Fund in
New York, whose 2011 book “Fuel Taxes and the Poor” includes

contributions from Cao. “She has an unusually well-developed

network of influential researchers and policy makers.”


Cao was born in Wuhu, Anhui province’s second-biggest city,

famous for its lakes and, since 2008, a 74-meter-high tower

shaped like a glass fish on a bridge over the Yangtze River.


Her father was a driver and her mother worked in an egg

factory, where hundreds of chickens are kept in rows of cages.

She said neither had a college education because of the Cultural

Revolution, when students from the cities were forced to work on

farms.


An only child, Cao said she never traveled outside Wuhu,

300 kilometers (185 miles) west of Shanghai, until she was

offered a place in Peking University in 1994 to study geology, a

rare choice for a girl at the time. Eager “to see the outside

world,” she jumped at the chance.


“I liked the great outdoors,” she said. “I never thought

I would study economics.”


Field Trips


During the next two years she stuck with geology, making

field trips to the mountains around Qinhuangdao in Hebei

province
, accompanied by a telescope and compass, “because I

often got lost.” It was one of these trips that sparked her

interest in China’s pollution.


“We stayed in a hotel downtown,” she said. “I was

reading by the window and I noticed that the pages would become

covered in dust. I guessed it was from the coal. The pollution

in Qinhuangdao was scary.”


Since her visit, the city has become China’s biggest coal

port, delivering 235 million metric tons of the fuel last year,

according to China Coal Transport and Distribution Association.


In her third year, she was among a group of students given

the option of joining a dual-degree program in economics, led by

Justin Lin, who later became chief economist and senior vice

president of the World Bank. Her teachers included Wen Hai, now

vice president of Peking University, and Yi Gang, now deputy

governor of China’s central bank.


Geology Telescope


Attending classes in the university’s large lecture

theaters, “I never succeeded in getting a seat in the front

rows,” Cao said. So she brought her geology telescope to read

the small numbers in equations her professors scribbled on the

blackboards.


After finishing the program in 1998, she combined her

experience and pursued a career in environmental economics. In

2001 she went to Guiyang, capital of Guizhou province in

southwest China, for her first field research in her new

discipline. While in the city — which has large steel, coal and

chemical industries — she noticed the buildings degraded much

more quickly than those she’d seen in Singapore.


“Twenty- or 30-year-old Singapore houses looked newer than

five-year-old Chinese houses,” she said. “Not until then did I

realize how serious acid rain was in China.”


Cao said her challenge was to find a way to persuade a

country pursuing short-term industrial growth also to address

the long-term effects of climate change.


Energy Savings


“People talked about what would happen in 50 or 100

years,” she said. To make the debate more immediate for

lawmakers, Cao decided to quantify the so-called co-benefits of

pollution reduction, things like energy savings and lower

medical costs that provide an immediate return.


Her case study on the public-health benefits of emission

reduction and technology innovation in local power plants,

cement factories and steel plants helped her gain admission to a

doctorate program at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of

Government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and her research caught

the attention of Harvard ProfessorDale Jorgenson, who later

became her tutor.


She expanded her analysis of carbon control at Harvard

before returning to Tsinghua, where she was one of the authors

of a joint study by China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection

and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the cost

benefits in China’s power industry from energy-saving and

emission-reduction policies for 2006-2010.


Evaluation Tools


Cao’s aim was to provide the Chinese government with tools

it could use to evaluate the real costs of policies. A

breakthrough came when the government published its 12th five-year plan for 2011-2015, which included a reference to the

introduction of an “environmental protection tax,” Cao said.


Li Shuo, a Beijing-based analyst with environmental group

Greenpeace, is skeptical about how quickly such a tax would be

adopted, or whether it would come before a cap-and-trade market.


“We have been seeing the indication of a future carbon tax

for a few years now — most of the time with no meaningful

elaboration or detailed implementing road map,” Li wrote in an

e-mail on Sept. 26. “We see quite some intellectual exercises

here for sure, but none of them could be deemed as a concrete

policy intention.”


China has test programs in seven cities for cap-and-trade

and could expand those to a national system, said Shobhakar

Dhakal, former executive director of the Global Carbon Project,

an international scientific program hosted by the National

Institute for Environmental Studies in Japan.


Low Levy


Cao expects China will begin collecting carbon tax by 2015

at the earliest or within the next five-year plan. The levy

initially will be low — around 5 to 15 yuan per ton of carbon -

- because the government likes gradual change, she said. The

country also may roll out cap-and-trade measures for bigger

companies later on, perhaps after 2020, she added.


“China is getting rich and our lifestyles are becoming

westernized, which means the country will have higher emissions

in the future due to our reliance on fossil fuel,” Cao said.

“The Chinese economy has developed fast, but we sacrificed so

many things.”


Chinese women also “sacrifice a lot,” she said. “It’s

very difficult to strike a balance between career and family.”

Time is “a luxury for me; my family have breakfast, lunch and

supper in canteens either in Tsinghua University or China

Academy of Sciences,” where her husband works as a researcher.

While she splits the housework with him, she spends more time

with their seven-year-old son.


Spicy Rabbit


She said she cooks on the weekend, including her son’s

favorite dishes: spicy rabbit with lots of chili and fish.

Otherwise, her free time is dedicated to helping him with

schoolwork or taking him on trips to museums.


“I haven’t read a book in ages,” she said. “I used to

like novels but don’t have time for them anymore.”


Instead, part of Cao’s time is taken up in lobbying for the

adoption of environmental-tax measures.


“Economists like to talk about tax, but everybody hates

tax,” she said. To craft a proposal that would win support, she

began to canvass opinions of ordinary people and work on a

structure that would be acceptable to all sides.


“The biggest obstacles of climate policies are inertia and

interest groups, just like other reforms in China,” she said.


Those groups include powerful lobbies from big state-owned

enterprises and electricity generators. To overcome this barrier,

Cao suggests the carbon tax be integrated into an overhaul of

the tax system that would limit the cost of new environmental

measures.


“If everybody objects to your reform plan, then it’s

unrealistic,” she said. “It must be both politically feasible

and economically efficient. In economics, you often just make a

bigger cake and let somebody else do the cutting. But we care

about the size of this cake, as well as its fair distribution.

We must make a real policy. We can’t just tell a fairy tale.”


–Sarah Chen and Hu Shen. With assistance from Feiwen Rong,
Kevin Hamlin and Henry Sanderson in Beijing. Editors: Adam Majendie, Melinda Grenier


To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story:

Sarah Chen in Beijing at

schen514@bloomberg.net


To contact the editor responsible:

Paul Panckhurst at

ppanckhurst@bloomberg.net



Enlarge image
2b92b iHo4Y7vQq dQ


Tsinghua Economics Professor Cao Jing


2b92b i4h7CJSo9SZA


Kelvin Ma/Bloomberg


Cao Jing, associate professor of economics at Tsinghua University in Beijing, stands for a photograph on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge.


Cao Jing, associate professor of economics at Tsinghua University in Beijing, stands for a photograph on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge. Photographer: Kelvin Ma/Bloomberg



Enlarge image
2b92b ig6hAxXpyjo4


Tsinghua Economics Professor Cao Jing


daa6e iQxggb2T1Hr8


Kelvin Ma/Bloomberg


“China is in urgent need of climate policies like a carbon tax to save energy and reduce emissions,” said Cao Jing, associate professor of economics at Tsinghua University in Beijing. “If they are well designed, there will be no big impact on the economy. If they are poorly designed, they may bring disastrous consequences.”


“China is in urgent need of climate policies like a carbon tax to save energy and reduce emissions,” said Cao Jing, associate professor of economics at Tsinghua University in Beijing. “If they are well designed, there will be no big impact on the economy. If they are poorly designed, they may bring disastrous consequences.” Photographer: Kelvin Ma/Bloomberg



China"s Poisoned Air Prompts Woman to Devise Green Tax

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét